I normally consider the U.S. Senate to be the adults in the room. Average age is 60.4 (109th ? Congress) and just a few months ago, 1 Senator was in his 90s; and 5 re in their 80s, 19 are in their 70s, 36 are in their 60s, 29 are in their 50s, and 10 are in their 40s. Today there is a significantly larger and more diverse U.S. population and there are too many technological issues to be dealt with. And there seems
...more »
I normally consider the U.S. Senate to be the adults in the room. Average age is 60.4 (109th ? Congress) and just a few months ago, 1 Senator was in his 90s; and 5 re in their 80s, 19 are in their 70s, 36 are in their 60s, 29 are in their 50s, and 10 are in their 40s. Today there is a significantly larger and more diverse U.S. population and there are too many technological issues to be dealt with. And there seems to be too much power by unelected staff members, so don’t increase staff numbers, just split existing staff numbers with new senators. Would cause the majority to change and all that (2/3rds would be 100 vice 67, etc., etc.), but nothing else needs to change but the quantity. All other terms and conditions of the Constitution, etc., etc., would be modified with the new number after a constitutional amendment.
« less
full details »