eliminate the stigma of stopping ineffective programs
In many partrs of the government, leading a "successful" program is a path to career success, which sometimes creates an incentive for a program manager to defend their program to the bitter end, even if they know the program to be flawed, ineffective, or wasteful. By creating a culture where saying "This isn't working" is just as valued as being "successful", we can potentially save money. This should be tied to effort ...more »
In many partrs of the government, leading a "successful" program is a path to career success, which sometimes creates an incentive for a program manager to defend their program to the bitter end, even if they know the program to be flawed, ineffective, or wasteful. By creating a culture where saying "This isn't working" is just as valued as being "successful", we can potentially save money.
This should be tied to effort to make it both easier to start and fund efforts, and to shut them down. In the current procurement process, it's so hard to start and fund anything that once a program is up and running, it becomes at least partially focused on self-preservation, not on optimal performance, because the cost of "starting over" is so high in both time and schedule delay.
Killing ineffective programs should not also kill one's career.
« less full details »

