I agreeto Idea One DoD Acquisition Regulation, Team, and IT System
Voting is Disabled

8 votes

Rank3153

Idea#4559

This idea is active.
Increasing Trade, Exports, and Overall Competitiveness »

One DoD Acquisition Regulation, Team, and IT System

The current structure of DoD acquisition is a combination of fiefdoms, confusing regulatory variances, varying degrees of competency and experience, non-standard practices, ancient and incompatible IT systems, and lacks clear coordination. Bringing DoD acquisition under one "purple" organization allows for standardized practices, eliminates overlapping and redundant offices, and establishs a clear set of "rules of the road" to allow our acquisition professionals to focus on obtaining the best value for the Warfighter and the US taxpayer.

As an example, our current IT infrastructure consists of a hodge podge of systems and architectures dating back to the Johnson Administration (1960s). In the case of paying contractors, the backbones is MOCAS, a system implemented before the vast majority of the current users were born. In terms of contract writing and transmitting the current system uses EDA, EDW, PADS, PD2, MDO, FPDS-NG, FBO, various SAP based concepts, and the list goes on. These systems all require seperate logins, maintenance, are not accessible by users outside of the operating agency, mostly not interoperable, many require extensive specialized training, and none are terribly user friendly.

IT is a force multiplier when used correctly, but we continue to use it as a not too gussied up word processor. In many ways, we are still using typewriters and fax machines.

Similarly, standardization will allow DoD to deploy a "right sized" workforce that is capable of obtaining the best products and servies, leveraging economies of scale, obtaining the best value, and maximizing the utility of the taxpayer's dollar.

Submitted by Community Member 2 years ago

Vote Activity Show

Comments (3)

  1. We are farrrrrr behind on the times in terms of IT. Its laughable. The systems don't even work half the time.

    2 years ago
    0
  2. In a perfect world, I would like to order my office supplies, maintenance and equipment on-line, from a big Amazon.com type website. Right now we have "mandatory" sources that are way up there in price and DLA is the "slowest" delivery on earth. The base ServMarts are over priced and a percentage of the time do not carry what we need. We aren't exclusively and office we are part white collar, part blue collar. I love GSA Advantage, some people don't. But for me, I can buy everything from soup to nuts and have it delivered in a timely manner. DoDemall, is not user friendly and the pictures of the items are few and far between. If the item/equipment is over the micro threshold, I do a PR Builder. This is fine, however, we wait 90-120 days before we get the item.

    IT, the inner circle of hell. Ordering non-networked hardware and software is like scooping water from a sieve. It takes 6 months, and I have it documented, to order a laptop. I kid you not. It takes a week or more to submit paperwork to order software, then when the PR Builder is sent, you wait, and keep your fingers crossed that it was routed correctly and reached the nether space of the next unknown pair of eyes to process your order. Hardware and software not processed at your local supply/contract office, it is sent "somewhere", where the process then slows to a crawl.

    Let's add the fed supply system into the mix. You have to fill out an apature card. Now when is the last time you saw one of those, circa 197?, then you have to "fax". We tried that once. Our order NEVER arrived. Either fix it, or get rid of it.

    I would "one" set of policy, not 50. Simplify the system and move into the 21st century. I work for DoN, and believe me, the paper tiger grows daily, and hoops you have to jump through, change with the wind.

    2 years ago
    0
  3. MOCAS should be replaced with a single all-inclusive database that acts as a "one-stop shop" for all Acquisitions services. This would include the implementation of draft contracts/MODs/DD250's; allowing for automatic implementation once accepted by Government. It should also have the ability

    to store/retrieve reporting and metric data and contain updated conforming contract information (i.e. a real-time, single contract that reflects not

    only the base contract, but also implementation of all modifications).

    This database would not only eliminate many of the human data integrity errors that currently exist, but would also eliminate the need for many

    databases that are presently being used to complement the outdated and limited-capability MOCAS system (WAWF, EDA, EDW, REVEAL etc.). Implementation of this new database would eventually lead to a reduction in the number of

    positions required within the Government Acquisition workforce, and accordingly, the loss of Acquisitions personnel which is expected to occur

    through attrition would not become such a detriment to remaining personnel.

    Access to certain modules within this new database can be granted to select contractors and customers, based upon their necessary requirements. For

    example, access can be granted for contractor's to input draft modifications and DD250's, much as they presently have access to WAWF to accomplish this

    task. -This is not a new concept... as contractors currently have access to the WAWF system that automatically updates MOCAS when gov approves a dd250.

    In order to alleviate the burden of transferring all the data that currently exists in MOCAS (driving high costs when associated with replacing it)... MOCAS should be maintained for historic contract information only while all new contracts would be entered into the new system--MOCAS will eventually be phased out through attrition.

    2 years ago
    0